What factors must the court consider in determining whether to order an injunction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assn. v. Furlotti, 70 Cal.App.4th 1487, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 455 (Cal. App. 1999):
9 Given our conclusion here, we need not reach the second factor courts must consider in determining whether to order an injunction, namely the relative harm the parties may suffer. (Scates v. Rydingsword, supra, 229 Cal.App.3d at p. 1096, 280 Cal.Rptr. 544.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining whether to award punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
What factors are considered by the California Supreme Court in determining whether to grant a dependency order? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
What factors will the court consider in determining whether an individual has been restrained by a police officer during an interview? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
Can the jury consider the importance of the age factor in determining whether or not the evidence should be considered "triple count" or "double count"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court considered the relevant factors in a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
