What constitutes misconduct when a prosecutor uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade a jury?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gray, G045645 (Cal. App. 2013):
A prosecutor commits misconduct when he or she uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade a jury. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 274.) A prosecutor may not present evidence that he or she knows to be false and must correct any falsity of which he or she is aware. (People v. Seaton (2001) 26 Cal.4th 598, 647.)
Page 37
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for misconduct in a federal civil case when the jury finds that a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict him of misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes reversible misconduct for a prosecutor who makes use of 'deceptive or reprehensible methods' to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes prosecutorial misconduct if a prosecutor makes use of deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is it a prosecutorial misconduct for a prosecutor to use misleading, deceptive, reprehensible or reprehensible methods to persuade either the court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to commit misconduct committed misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes reversible misconduct for a prosecutor who makes use of 'deceptive or reprehensible methods' to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct in criminal law when a prosecutor uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict him? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for using deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury to convict a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for using deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor who uses deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the jury commit misconduct? (California, United States of America)
