California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Preyer, 164 Cal.App.3d 568, 210 Cal.Rptr. 807 (Cal. App. 1985):
Appellant contends that the trial court erred because it did not state any reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. Ordinarily, a court must state its reasons for imposing consecutive rather than concurrent sentences. [164 Cal.App.3d 577] (People v. Bejarano (1981) 114 Cal.App.3d 693, 704, 173
Page 813
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.