What are the legal adequacy of jury instructions in a case where a jury was instructed to acquit a defendant of unreasonable self-defense?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Moreno, B288334 (Cal. App. 2018):
We review the legal adequacy of the jury instructions independently. (People v. Simon (2016) 1 Cal.5th 98, 133.) Although we find that substantial evidence supports a theory of unreasonable self-defense, we do not find it reasonably probable that such an instruction would have produced a different result.
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
If a jury is instructed to convict a defendant of robbery based solely on the taking of items from the victim's person, is this instructional error inconsequential or prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to propose any modification to a flight instruction forfeits a claim of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the jury instruction was legally deficient or biased? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to complain to the Court on appeal that an instruction in a criminal case instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possessing all six firearms was "too general or incomplete"? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to instruct a jury on a defendant's manslaughter instruction? (California, United States of America)
When will a court grant a defendant an instruction that cautions the jury that it may not draw an adverse inference from the fact that a defendant has not testified at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
