What are the implications of the error by the trial court in determining that a defendant was denied a fair trial by mistake?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martin, B232642 (Cal. App. 2013):
Without analysis, defendant contends that the trial court's error resulted in the denial of his rights to due process and a fair trial under the United States Constitution, and that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to provide the court with authority on the issue. We do not reach undeveloped claims. (See People v.
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in determining whether a defendant received a fair trial due to a series of trial errors? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with error at trial where a prosecutor made an error in making an improper remark to a defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court's error contributed to a jury's error? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have any prejudicial error in instructing a jury to convict a defendant of burglary by mistake? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)
