California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Arias, In re, 230 Cal.Rptr. 505, 42 Cal.3d 667, 725 P.2d 664 (Cal. 1986):
For the foregoing reasons, while federal cases may be illustrative of the problems inherent in balancing the state's security interests against the rights of detainees (cf. Bailey v. Loggins (1982) 32 Cal.3d 907, 922, 187 Cal.Rptr. 575, 654 P.2d 758 (plur.opn.)), they do not define the scope of rights guaranteed by section 2600.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.