The following excerpt is from Hajro v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 811 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir. 2015):
On appeal, we reversed and remanded. We held that the district court had overlooked the existence of genuine issues of material fact as to whether increasing workloads at INS offices created "exceptional circumstances" justifying its failure to respond within the statutory time limits, and whether the agency had demonstrated "due diligence" in responding to requests for information urgently needed by aliens who faced pending deportation or exclusion proceedings. See Mayock v. Nelson, 938 F.2d 1006, 100708 (9th Cir.1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.