What are the implications of a federal court's failure to group fraud and money laundering charges as a single group?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from USA v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422 (9th Cir. 2000):
Syrax contends that the district court erred by failing to group his fraud and money laundering counts as a single group under U.S.S.G. 3D1.2(b) or (d). The district court's refusal to group offenses under the guidelines is subject to de novo review. See United States v. Hanley, 190 F.3d 1017, 1033 (9th Cir. 1999).
Section 3D1.2 provides in part that:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does money laundering and money laundering constitute money laundering offences? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal habeas corpus judge finds that a state criminal court violated the Fourth Amendment, what are the implications for the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the implications of a federal district court's decision on a motion brought by a plaintiff in a federal civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual assault in the Superior Court of Justice at the Court of Appeal preclude the appellant from seeking federal relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
