The following excerpt is from Olvera v. Cnty. of Sacramento, NO. CIV. 2:10-550 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. 2013):
The elements for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress are "(1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct." Christensen v. Superior Court, 54 Cal. 3d 868, 904 (1991) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Because defendants initially limited their request for summary judgment on this claim to arguing that they were immune, their opening briefs did not address the merits and plaintiffs' opposition relating to the merits is minimal at best. For the first time in their reply, defendants appear to abandon any claim of immunity and address the merits of the claim.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.