The following excerpt is from Bumagat v. Shillinger, No. 2:17-cv-2008-TLN-KJN (PS) (E.D. Cal. 2019):
Therefore, all of plaintiff's claims against County Defendants are subject to dismissal. Additionally, the court finds that further leave to amend would be futile. See Cahill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend, when further amendment was deemed to be futile). Plaintiff has already been granted leave to amend in this matter, which did not cure these deficiencies. Moreover, in his opposition plaintiff does not point to any new facts that he could allege against County Defendants that would state a claim or defeat the immunities set forth herein. (See ECF Nos. 3, 39, 59.)
B. City Defendants
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.