The following excerpt is from Barger v. Dir. CDCR, No. 2:14-cv-2310-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. 2015):
1. It further appears that plaintiff's claims are similar to those raised in a prior action, case number 2:14-cv-1323-TLN-EFB, and that it is insufficient to state a claim for violation of his Eighth Amendment rights under 28 U.S.C. 1983. See Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir. 1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.