What are some of the reasons the court will consider in deciding whether to grant a conditional discharge?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mejia, H041852 (Cal. App. 2017):
consider not just the evidence itself, but also the record of reasons the court provides.' " (People v. Fuiava (2012) 53 Cal.4th 622, 712.)
3. Analysis
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court considered section 3427 of the California Civil Code in deciding whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the relevant factors in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
Does the court err in failing to consider posttraumatic stress disorder as a factor in determining whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "broad discretion" in deciding whether to grant a conditional discharge? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered past conduct of an attorney in deciding whether to grant sanctions? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence in the record that the court failed to consider all relevant criteria including appellant's personal characteristics when deciding whether to grant or deny probation? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial in a sexual assault case brought by Dimas, who is remanded on remand pending a retrial, what factors will the court consider in deciding whether to grant or deny the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a court's specification of reasons for granting a motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds or reasons for the decision to grant the motion, constitute untimely and void? (California, United States of America)
