The Ontario Court of Appeal explained the concept of a palpable and overriding error in Waxman v. Waxman, 2004 CanLII 1516. A palpable error is one that is “obvious, plain to see or clear” - for example, one that is based on a misapprehension of the evidence (at para. 296). An overriding error is one that “is sufficiently significant to vitiate the challenged finding of fact” (at para. 297).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.