23. As noted in Mineault v. Kamloops (City), 2017 BCSC 316 at paragraph 67, where water flows from one property to an adjoining property, courts routinely find that the parties owe a duty of care to each other with respect to that water. In my view, the respondent owed a duty of care to the applicant and other neighbours whom he might reasonably foresee would be at risk of harm if water escaped from his unit.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.