Is there a just and equitable award for a testatrix who failed to provide adequate provision for her son?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Penty v. Mott, 1984 CanLII 668 (BC SC):

Having found the testatrix made no adequate provision for her son, there must now be an award that is just and equitable: see Walker v. McDermott, 1930 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1931] 1 D.L.R. 662, [1931] S.C.R. 94.

Other Questions


What is the case law in favour of awarding an award under the head of an award for gross negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making provision for the claimant that was adequate, just and equitable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of failing to provide adequate notice to the public of a land use and zoning bylaw? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a trial judge to include a provision in a judgment that awards a capital sum, calculated on the basis that it will provide income stream? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where the respondent failed to provide a full and proper financial disclosure to the claimant? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the meaning of the phrase “adequate, just and equitable” in the context of the maintenance of the spouse's children? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a will variation based on the failure to make adequate provision for the maintenance and support of a spouse or child? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge award a special costs award for an unsuccessful claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the authority for reducing spousal support awards within the appropriate range of awards? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.