In her majority reasons in Peter v. Beblow, McLachlin J. refused to distinguish between family and commercial cases. She said at 996-97: I doubt the wisdom of dividing unjust enrichment cases into two categories – commercial and family – for the purpose of determining whether a constructive trust lies. … In short, the concern for clarity and doctrinal integrity with which this court has long been preoccupied in this area mandates that the basic principles governing the rights and remedies for unjust enrichment remain the same for all cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.