He further argues that if any mistake occurred, it was a unilateral mistake caused by the negligence of the wife’s lawyer. If there was a unilateral mistake the wife could only obtain relief if she could establish that there was fraud or the equivalent of fraud on the husband’s part in that he knew or must be taken to have known that when the agreement was entered the wife misunderstood its significance and that the husband did nothing to enlighten the wife. This test for relief for unilateral mistake was utilized in Cozart v. Cozart 2007 SKQB 160, [2007] S.J. No. 202 (Smith J.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.