British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Strauss v. Albrico, 2007 BCSC 197 (CanLII):
However, it is necessary for the court to engage in a contextual approach, by analyzing all the circumstances surrounding an employee’s alleged misconduct, in order to determine if the dishonesty alleged amounted to just cause for termination without notice. McKinley v. B C Tel, 2001 SCC 38 sets out a two-part factual test at para. 49: 1. Does the evidence establish the employee's deceitful conduct on a balance of probabilities? 2. If so, does the nature and degree of the dishonesty warrant dismissal?
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.