In the case Re Prater Designe v. Beare, 37 Ch. D. 481, at p. 486, Cotton, L.J., said: “There are cases where a gift of property in a particular locality has been held to include debts due from persons in that locality. I think these latter cases go upon this—that there was in the wills a sufficient indication of intention to include under the description of property in a particular place that which really cannot have any locality. Those cases, in my opinion, shew that the rule that choses in action have no locality must not deter us from holding them to be included in a gift of property in a particular locality, if we come to the conclusion that the intention of the testator was so to include them.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.