The principal argument of the wife, citing Moge v. Moge (1992), 1992 CanLII 25 (SCC), 99 D.L.R. (4th) 456, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813, 43 R.F.L. (3d) 345, is that the order of the motions court judge does not recognize the economic disadvantages to her arising from the marriage and its breakdown. Although evidence before the court relevant to the assessment of the economic consequences of the breakdown of the marriage is a virtual lacuna, I will assume for the purpose of considering the wife's argument that the marriage of the parties was a "traditional" one, and that, as a result, the wife's skills and benefits were curtailed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.