It is thus apparent that the value of the family assets is dramatically less now than it was at the date of the triggering event. The law seems to be well settled that assets subject to division should be valued as of the date of trial unless there is a persuasive reason to find otherwise or the factors set out in s. 65 apply. See: Gilpin v. Gilpin, [1990] B.C.J. No. 2272; Rapley v. Rapley, 2006 BCSC 1854.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.