The usage of current tables in calculating retroactive support was not raised as an issue on appeal. As there was no argument on this point, I offer no opinion on the appropriateness of such a practice, and whether it accomplishes the same goals as pre-judgment interest, namely recognition of the impact of inflation and the impact of the recipient being denied the opportunity to utilize the funds at the time they were due (Courtney v. Cleary, 2010 NLCA 46, 299 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 85, at para. 88).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.