The timber berths in question were purchased by the defendants at the request of the plaintiff and with the plaintiff’s money; it is true the money was advanced by the defendants but the plaintiff’s account was charged with the amounts advanced and he ultimately repaid the sums to the defendants Under the circumstances there is a resulting trust, the presumption being that the property in the berths was in the person who furnished the moneys. The rule is stated in the leading case of Dyer v. Dyer (1788) 2 Cox 92, 30 E.R. 42 as follows: The trust of a legal estate, whether freehold, copyhold, or leasehold; whether taken in the names of the purchasers and others jointly, or in” the names of others without that of the purchaser; whether in one name or several; whether jointly or successive, results to the man who advances the purchase-money * * *
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.