22 I do not think, with respect, that the respondent's argument proceeds on proper interpretation of Palmer v. Goodall, supra. That case does not stand for the proposition that the trier of fact may not use the income earned in the pre-accident job as a benchmark for assessing the loss of future earning capacity. Nor does it hold that a claimant must negative every possible occupation that may be available. Application of the Approach
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.