With respect to counsel’s submission that the learned trial judge erred in law by failing, as alleged, to give credence to the defence of automatism, I point out for the information of counsel that whether or not, at the time the appellant left the scenes of the accident he was in a state of automatism to such an extent as not to be legally responsible for his acts is a question of fact: Bleta v. R-, 1964 CanLII 14 (SCC), [1964] S.C.R. 561.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.