It was urged that the learned trial Judge was not justified in holding that there was excessive speed on the part of the appellant’s train, or that there was any obligation on the part of the appellant to approach the station cautiously, under control and prepared to stop. In effect, the learned trial Judge finds that the place where the accident took place was not a thickly populated part of the village, and I think that the evidence justifies such a finding. Under those circumstances there was no obligation on the part of the railway company to limit its rate of speed. See Andreas v. C.P.R., 1905 CanLII 26 (SCC), 37 S.C.R. 1.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.