As to the third ground of appeal, the father provided no jurisprudential or legislative support for the proposition that a court may not displace a naming-bargain struck by parents at the time of a child’s birth. In fact, such a proposition would seem to run counter to the inquiry required of a chambers judge in the circumstances, which is to determine whether dispensing with another legal custodian’s consent to a change of name is in the best interests of the children involved (see: Vanderlinde v. Bohn, 2003 SKQB 503, [2004] 5 W.W.R. 398, at para. 10).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.