As our Court of Appeal noted in Webster v. Ernst & Young (No.1), (2000), 75 B.C.L.R. (4th) 340 (B.C.C.A.), it is necessary for the trial judge to “estimate the possibilities” “arising on the evidence”. While it is the right of the plaintiff to recover all of his losses which are reasonably contemplated by the parties as liable to result from the breach, the party who has suffered from a breach of contract must take all reasonable steps to avoid such losses. In applying this general assessment to the case of shares, the touchstone is the test of “reasonableness” and what is reasonable will change with the factual matrix of the case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.