If, however, the determination of what constitutes reasonable notice is an assessment of damages, then the test for reviewing the jury’s award was that laid out in Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 1995 CanLII 59 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 at ¶ 161 and 162. The test then is “whether the verdict is so exorbitant or so grossly out of proportion . . . as to shock the court’s conscience and sense of justice.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.