I am not sure that the test for admission of deposition evidence should be different from that for the admission of any other evidence, at least where it is not a question of requesting the cooperation of courts in other jurisdictions (which was the case in the 1978 authority of Quinn v. Hurford, relied upon by the defendants). Further, this evidence is not tendered simply to corroborate that of the plaintiffs. I would not exclude the evidence as “merely corroborative”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.