In Nelles v. Ontario, 1989 CanLII 77 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 170 at 199, Lamer J. said that absolute immunity does not apply to claims for malicious prosecution because malice should not limit the rights of individual citizens to seek a remedy. In making that statement, he distinguished between the exercise of discretion, errors in judgment, and negligence, on the one hand, and motive that involves improper purpose that “involves an abuse or perversion of the system of criminal justice for ends that it was not designed to serve…”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.