The following excerpt is from Sherritt Gordon Mines Ltd. and TIW Industries Ltd. v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Locals 179 and 264, 1987 CanLII 4897 (SK CA):
The struggle in England at the turn of the century between the traditional freedom to trade and the emerging notions of collective action by labour was characterized in the main by a statutory rebalancing of the conflicting economic interests. Quinn v. Leathern provides the best example. The rule of that case is succinctly stated in the headnote of the report ([1901] A.C. 495): “A combination of two or more, without justification or excuse, to injure a man in his trade by inducing his customers or servants to break their contracts with him or not to deal with him or continue in his employment is, if it results in damage to him, actionable.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.