What is the rule of the rule on voluntary testimony?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Peddle, 2002 CanLII 14848 (NL PC):

[11] The statement of the rule, long considered definitive, is found in Ibrahim v. The King, [1914] A.C. 599 (P.C.): ...no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence against him unless it is shewn by the prosecution to have been a voluntary statement, in the sense that it has not been obtained from him either by fear of prejudice or hope of advantage exercised by a person in authority.

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to interfere with a trial judge’s findings of fact based conclusions drawn from conflicting testimony of expert witnesses? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for “voluntary assumption of risk” in the context of a claim for negligence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the implied undertaking of a party in a civil action? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for applying for a judicial review of an allegation of bias? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
When a plaintiff succeeds on one cause but fails on two other causes of action but loses out on the other two? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can the Chief of Police submit that because the Adjudicator made a finding regarding the inadequacy of the consent, such showed that he was alive to the issue of consent? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can an agreement be reduced to writing? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, does it need to set out the facts of the pleading? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What are the principles of alleged personal action? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a claim for fraudulently concealed water damage in the basement of a house? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.