What is the rule of the rule on voluntary testimony?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Peddle, 2002 CanLII 14848 (NL PC):

[11] The statement of the rule, long considered definitive, is found in Ibrahim v. The King, [1914] A.C. 599 (P.C.): ...no statement by an accused is admissible in evidence against him unless it is shewn by the prosecution to have been a voluntary statement, in the sense that it has not been obtained from him either by fear of prejudice or hope of advantage exercised by a person in authority.

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to interfere with a trial judge’s findings of fact based conclusions drawn from conflicting testimony of expert witnesses? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for “voluntary assumption of risk” in the context of a claim for negligence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
When will an injunction be obeyed implicitly? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a document sufficient to satisfy the rule of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the need to assess the totality of the circumstances and what is the impact of the "totality" of an informant’s tip? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the applicable law regarding conflict of interest? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there a presumption of no costs in a custody case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the totality principle of sentencing in the context of sexual assault cases? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the standard of appeal and what is the test for determining that a third respondent’s solicitor acted in a conflict of interest? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a claim for fraudulently concealed water damage in the basement of a house? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.