As held by McLachlin C.J.C. and Major J. in Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), [See Note 35 below] at para. 129, "The state is not entitled to arbitrarily limit its citizens' rights to life, liberty and security of the person." If a law which engages the liberty interest embedded in s. 7 bears no relation to, or is inconsistent with, the objective that lies behind it, then the law is arbitrary and as such is contrary to the principles of fundamental justice. To [page56 ]restrict a person's liberty on the basis of such an arbitrary law is a violation of that person's rights under s. 7.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.