The standards of review applicable are well established. As to pure questions of law, the standard of review is correctness. For findings of fact, it is palpable and overriding error. As to inferences of fact, an appellate court will intervene only if the trial judge has made a palpable and overriding error in coming to a factual conclusion based on accepted facts. See: Housen v. Nickolaisen (2002), 211 D.L.R. (4th) 577, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII). The Issues
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.