The respondents argue that the standard of review is reasonableness. In particular the respondents argue that a reviewing court must show deference to the decision being reviewed and must determine if the outcome falls within "a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law" (see Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick 2008 SCC 9 (CanLII), [2008] S.C.J. No. 9 at para 47).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.