The parties agree that the standard of review to be applied in this appeal asks whether the decision was reasonable. This is a deferential standard of review, in recognition of the Superintendent’s specialized expertise within a discrete and special administrative regime mandated to ensure the safety and well-being of the public on our highways: Paik v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2008 BCSC 1332 at para. 5. The reviewing court is concerned with “the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility within the decision-making process”, and asks “whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law”: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 at para. 47.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.