An appellate court should state and set the standard of review before proceeding to examine the grounds of appeal. Counsel has properly cited Housen v. Nikolaison, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 2002 SCC 33 for the general law on the standard of review. It is clear that the standard of review is correctness when the alleged error relates to a question of law: Housen at para. 8. When it relates to a question of fact alone, the standard is overriding and palpable error: Housen at para. 10. When the alleged error relates to a question of mixed law and facts, the trial judge’s decision is to be afforded deference unless the alleged error can be attributed to the application of an incorrect standard, a failure to consider a required element of a legal test or similar error in principle: Housen at para. 36.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.