The parties agree that Kalafchi v. Yao, 2015 BCCA 524, is the leading authority respecting the standard of review for a master’s order. Purely interlocutory orders are only to be reviewed if they are “clearly wrong,” whereas a rehearing is appropriate if the orders are final or raise questions vital to the final issue: para. 3.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.