Again, in the case of Chiau v. Canada (Minister of Justice) (1998), 1998 CanLII 9042 (FC), 141 F.T.R. 81, aff’d (2000) 2000 CanLII 16793 (FCA), 195 D.L.R. (4th) 422 (F.C.A.), Dubé J. addressed the proof requirement to establish reasonable grounds within the context of a warrant, and stated the following: The standard of proof required to establish “reasonable grounds” is more than a flimsy suspicion, but less than the civil test of balance of probabilities. And, of course, a much lower threshold than the criminal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” It is a bona fide belief in a serious possibility based on credible evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.