The standard of proof required by "reasonable grounds" is that of "reasonable probability", and not proof beyond a reasonable doubt or of a "prima facie case": Debot, supra, at p. 213. Reasonable grounds have also been described in Lam, supra, at para. 8 (citing Chiau v. Canada (Minister of Justice) (1998), 1998 CanLII 9042 (FC), 141 F.T.R. 81, aff'd (2000) 2000 CanLII 16793 (FCA), 195 D.L.R. (4th) 422 (F.C.A.) as: ...more than a flimsy suspicion, but less than the civil test of balance of probabilities. And, of course, a much lower standard that the criminal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt". It is a bona fide belief in a serious possibility based on credible evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.