What is the standard for a decision on review based on the testimony of a police officer?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lyebyedyev v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 217 (CanLII):
In the context of these particular reviews, it has been held that the standard is met when there is "some evidence on which a finding could reasonably be made"; Nagra v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2010 BCCA 154 (quoting Shadow v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2002 BCSC 790 at para. 13). However, the mere presence of such evidence will not preserve a decision on review if the reasoning process that has been engaged in by the adjudicator to reach it was manifestly flawed. Examples of manifest flaws in reasoning include an adjudicator according the evidence of a police officer a presumption of baseline reliability and then placing a burden on the applicant to refute it or making negative findings about an applicant's credibility on the basis of the applicant's failure to address factors that are not logically relevant to it: Scott v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2013 BCCA 554.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review in respect of a police officer's decision to issue a 24-hour driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard of review for a decision by a police officer to arrest a man for assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court review a decision by a police officer under section 90.3 of the Criminal Code when the officer applied the wrong test? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a Superintendent's Review based upon a written record based upon the Superintendent’s Review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a decision of a police officer to issue a 24-hour prohibition subject to judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
