The special case also failed to meet the requirements of Rule 9-3. It ought to have consisted of only the agreed statement of facts and copies of the documents referred to in the agreed statement. Affidavits should not have been included in the Special Case (see Gulkison v. Vancouver Police Board, 2015 BCCA 361 at para. 3). Fortunately, it is possible to simply ignore those parts of the affidavits that do not properly form part of the special case without prejudicing either party.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.