What is the burden of proving negligence in a motor vehicle accident case?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Farrell v. Casavant, 2009 NSSC 233 (CanLII):

As indicated previously, the skidding of a vehicle upon a highway is a neutral fact which is equally consistent with negligence or no negligence. The burden is on the Defendant to establish that the skid which caused the accident occurred without his negligence, or, to put it another way, he must show a way in which the skid may have occurred without negligence (Grant v. Lutes, supra, at ¶ 31.)

Other Questions


What is the test for negligence in a motor vehicle accident case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
If a motor vehicle is the cause of injury to a person who is injured in an accident, is it not the motor vehicle? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for "gross negligence" in motor vehicle accident law? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim of negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law that would relieve the Respondent of any liability for a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for proving causation in a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the case law on quantum meruit compensation for care of injured family members in a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for costs in a motor vehicle accident case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident, can a rock or piece of rock fall from a dump truck and hit the sunroof of a vehicle? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.