This takes me finally to the objection based on settlement privilege. Once again there was no real dispute regarding the applicable law: Costello v. Calgary (City) 1997 ABCA 281, at para 91 at which a three-part test is set out, as follows: (a) A litigious dispute must be in existence or within contemplation; (b) The communication must be made with the express or implied intention that it would not be disclosed to the court in the event negotiations failed; and (c) The purpose of the communication must be to attempt to effect a settlement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.