It is certainly arguable that the document and the communications related to it attract settlement privilege, but that privilege is subject to exceptions where “competing public interests” are at play. In particular, it has been held that privilege cannot be used to mislead the court as to the facts of the case and that admissions by a party in settlement correspondence which are inconsistent with other facts or evidence produced by that party to the court can be admitted into evidence as an exception to the privilege: Brown v. Brown, 2013 NBQB 438.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.