The plaintiff claims that this case falls within the second class of transactions. Counsel for the plaintiff argues that “Geffen v. Goodman Estate, 1991 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 353 [sic], determined that a gratuitous transfer from a parent to an adult child creates the presumption of undue influence by the adult child.” Counsel submits that as the presumption applies in this case, the onus shifts to the defendant to establish that Regina entered into the transaction as a result of her own "full, free and informed thought".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.