What is the case law in which a head-note is used to justify a respondent's decision not to file a cross petition?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Scheerer v. Scheerer, 1927 CanLII 119 (SK QB):
The second case to which I would make reference is Wingfield v. Wingfield (1898) 78 L.T. 568, where again the head-note serves our purpose, and in part reads as follows: Held that the Respondent’s proper course would have been to file a cross petition.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an application for leave to appeal against a finding that the respondent should pay the respondent's costs of the appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a plaintiff was denied damages or costs by a Respondent who had continued his adulterous relationship with the Respondent? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a juridical basis for a claim against the Respondent in the Superior Court of Justice for the loss of benefits received by the respondent and subsequently her estate? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What factors are considered in determining whether or not a decision maker has a duty of fairness when making a decision that is procedurally unfair? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a by-law requiring pedestrians to cross the tracks between a railway line and a public road require them to cross at a walking pace? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the court have jurisdiction to deal with a motion where there has been no written decision or formal review decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant deposed in an affidavit that he did not feel the allegations were truthful or justified? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is conduct of the parties a factor in determining whether or not a child has been found to be a contributing factor in a custody decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the trial judge err in allowing the respondent to introduce parol evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
