This second argument is wrong. There are many policy reasons against extending the tort of abuse of process to bystanders. The existing case law recognizes that the existing tort of abuse of process should be narrowly construed: Bentham v. Rothbart, [1989] O.J. No. 2967, 36 O.A.C. 13 (H.C.J.), and there are policy reasons for not recognizing a new tort of derivative abuse of process or foreseeable bystander abuse of process.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.