The defendants' second contention presents more difficulty. To be entitled to succeed, the plaintiff must show that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. In Pierce v. Provident Clothing & Supply Co. (1911) 1 K.B. 997, at p. 1003, 80 L.J.K.B. 831, Buckley L.J., says: "The words 'out of' necessarily involve the idea that the accident arises out of a risk incidental to the employment. An accident arises out of the employment where it results from a risk incidental to the employment and distinct from a risk common to all mankind, although the risk incidental to the employment may include a risk to mankind."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.